<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 一國兩制の迷惘</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.naitik.net/blog/792/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.naitik.net/blog/792</link>
	<description>Despite all my rage I am still just a rat in a cage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:54:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 無塵工作室</title>
		<link>http://www.naitik.net/blog/792/comment-page-1#comment-983</link>
		<dc:creator>無塵工作室</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 10:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.naitik.net/blog/792#comment-983</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s what &quot;50 years no change&quot; really means, what the tories (Patton et. al. were Tories) told us then doesn&#039;t mean that it still applies now, we are ruled by the grandpas up north now.

However, looking back, I feel it&#039;s inevitable that this will happen, because the foundation had already been laid since the 80&#039;s, it&#039;s just that we were all blinded by the 90s boom created by the British establishment before they left.

One-party rule (pseudo-dictatorship) and democracy are both contradictory philosophies, do you really think both can happen at the same place, at the same time?  This doesn&#039;t mean I&#039;m pro-Communist, I still don&#039;t like what they do, and the future looks rather worrying.

I&#039;m even hoping that China can become as capitalistic as they wanted to, I really want to see what this oxymoron (capitalistic communists) will actually become.

Speaking of Animal farm, &quot;All animals are equal&quot; was genuinely true at the start, but then corruption kicked in, until it finally became &quot;4 legs good, 2 legs better&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what &#8220;50 years no change&#8221; really means, what the tories (Patton et. al. were Tories) told us then doesn&#8217;t mean that it still applies now, we are ruled by the grandpas up north now.</p>
<p>However, looking back, I feel it&#8217;s inevitable that this will happen, because the foundation had already been laid since the 80&#8242;s, it&#8217;s just that we were all blinded by the 90s boom created by the British establishment before they left.</p>
<p>One-party rule (pseudo-dictatorship) and democracy are both contradictory philosophies, do you really think both can happen at the same place, at the same time?  This doesn&#8217;t mean I&#8217;m pro-Communist, I still don&#8217;t like what they do, and the future looks rather worrying.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m even hoping that China can become as capitalistic as they wanted to, I really want to see what this oxymoron (capitalistic communists) will actually become.</p>
<p>Speaking of Animal farm, &#8220;All animals are equal&#8221; was genuinely true at the start, but then corruption kicked in, until it finally became &#8220;4 legs good, 2 legs better&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pcheung25</title>
		<link>http://www.naitik.net/blog/792/comment-page-1#comment-980</link>
		<dc:creator>pcheung25</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 04:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.naitik.net/blog/792#comment-980</guid>
		<description>我反而擔心政棍亂用平常心的問題，長此下去，小朋友便秘也用平常心面對且罝之不理，咁就大件事啦！</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>我反而擔心政棍亂用平常心的問題，長此下去，小朋友便秘也用平常心面對且罝之不理，咁就大件事啦！</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chainsaw Riot</title>
		<link>http://www.naitik.net/blog/792/comment-page-1#comment-976</link>
		<dc:creator>Chainsaw Riot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 02:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.naitik.net/blog/792#comment-976</guid>
		<description>同一個節目，查大俠作為基本法起草委員，他說「中國沒有普選，香港也不會有普選」。另一個甚麼律師說，我們不可以用香港持之以恆的普通法的想法去差度中國大陸那班人對香港法治的理解。這是他們對一國兩制的看法。
原來，特區政府官方的「十二億人口的大陸實行社會主義制度，特別行政區則實行資本主義制度」，是指我們要慢慢和大陸接軌，奉行大陸的所謂「民主政制」，以及應該去除普通法的想法，而用大陸接近人治的方式去對待基本法。難怪，基本法慢慢變成政治工具。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>同一個節目，查大俠作為基本法起草委員，他說「中國沒有普選，香港也不會有普選」。另一個甚麼律師說，我們不可以用香港持之以恆的普通法的想法去差度中國大陸那班人對香港法治的理解。這是他們對一國兩制的看法。<br />
原來，特區政府官方的「十二億人口的大陸實行社會主義制度，特別行政區則實行資本主義制度」，是指我們要慢慢和大陸接軌，奉行大陸的所謂「民主政制」，以及應該去除普通法的想法，而用大陸接近人治的方式去對待基本法。難怪，基本法慢慢變成政治工具。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On A Night Like This</title>
		<link>http://www.naitik.net/blog/792/comment-page-1#comment-1420</link>
		<dc:creator>On A Night Like This</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.naitik.net/blog/792#comment-1420</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt; ＊ ＊ ＊  看到nikita的blog，我問到 一國兩制 的意義。其實一國兩制可能只是一個過渡時期的謊言，鄧小平這位總設計師在思考這個偉大構想之時，腦中可能只有一句叫作「一國兩制」的口號，這個口號竟有不同的演繹。慢慢發現，兩制&lt;!--%kramer-post--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%--> ＊ ＊ ＊  看到nikita的blog，我問到 一國兩制 的意義。其實一國兩制可能只是一個過渡時期的謊言，鄧小平這位總設計師在思考這個偉大構想之時，腦中可能只有一句叫作「一國兩制」的口號，這個口號竟有不同的演繹。慢慢發現，兩制<!--%kramer-post--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By:  JeffHung.Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.naitik.net/blog/792/comment-page-1#comment-1421</link>
		<dc:creator> JeffHung.Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.naitik.net/blog/792#comment-1421</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;   今日連結： 一國兩制の迷惘  - 標題是故意要用日文的「の」的嗎？ 唸乾稿推廣 一日目 - 我也要推不花俏的新聞！ 更多 RSS 可以做的事 - 會不會把 RSS 吵得太凶了？因為 RSS 的使用，其實是一種 pull 機制，而且不像 news&lt;!--%kramer-post--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->   今日連結： 一國兩制の迷惘  &#8211; 標題是故意要用日文的「の」的嗎？ 唸乾稿推廣 一日目 &#8211; 我也要推不花俏的新聞！ 更多 RSS 可以做的事 &#8211; 會不會把 RSS 吵得太凶了？因為 RSS 的使用，其實是一種 pull 機制，而且不像 news<!--%kramer-post--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syndicated feeds Press</title>
		<link>http://www.naitik.net/blog/792/comment-page-1#comment-1422</link>
		<dc:creator>Syndicated feeds Press</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.naitik.net/blog/792#comment-1422</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;  2005/07/04   eat what?[食記] 北京烤鴨 聚園.陶然亭.真北平VS.富順樓 （真值得推荐）經濟實惠的阿萬生魚片用數位相機拍美食的小撇步 one country, two what? 一國兩制の迷惘 第七百四十一天：回歸八周年雜感七一快樂政論：左派勝了一仗 Live what?當Live 8槓上 G8Live 8 !Live 8live 8 what of the worlds?世界大戰 War of The Worlds我看【世界大戰 War of the Worlds】&lt;!--%kramer-post--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->  2005/07/04   eat what?[食記] 北京烤鴨 聚園.陶然亭.真北平VS.富順樓 （真值得推荐）經濟實惠的阿萬生魚片用數位相機拍美食的小撇步 one country, two what? 一國兩制の迷惘 第七百四十一天：回歸八周年雜感七一快樂政論：左派勝了一仗 Live what?當Live 8槓上 G8Live 8 !Live 8live 8 what of the worlds?世界大戰 War of The Worlds我看【世界大戰 War of the Worlds】<!--%kramer-post--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richy's Blog (兼營網摘)</title>
		<link>http://www.naitik.net/blog/792/comment-page-1#comment-1423</link>
		<dc:creator>Richy's Blog (兼營網摘)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.naitik.net/blog/792#comment-1423</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt; 一國兩制の迷惘 第七百四十一天：回歸八周年雜感七一快樂政論：左派勝了一仗 Live what?當Live 8槓上 G8Live 8 !Live 8live 8 what of the worlds?世界大戰 War of The Worlds我看【世界大戰 War of the Worlds】&lt;!--%kramer-post--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%--> 一國兩制の迷惘 第七百四十一天：回歸八周年雜感七一快樂政論：左派勝了一仗 Live what?當Live 8槓上 G8Live 8 !Live 8live 8 what of the worlds?世界大戰 War of The Worlds我看【世界大戰 War of the Worlds】<!--%kramer-post--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

