The GNU FDL is a large and complex license with some innovative ideas in it, just as the GNU GPL was over a decade ago. It has taken some time for people to develop an understanding of it, which of course including myself.
I like some of the aims of the GNU FDL, such as trying to keep things readable with non-proprietary software, but I’d rather avoid the quagmire of how they’re implemented in the GNU FDL. My problem with it: it’s nearly incomprehensible, even if I found most of the terms acceptible but sometimes I don’t think I could be sure I was complying with the license. I also think the GNU FDL is somewhat suitable for documentation of software, which needs to be kept in synch with the software, but it’s not so obviously suitable for weblog. A Creative Commons licenses might be more suitable for a work of diary.
For anyone who cares, I’m releasing my online journal / diary / blog under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike licenses now.
當日今日:- 2011: Mobile softee(3)
- 2010: 今夜,飛奔採晚星!(3)
- 2010: Post-it 馬里奧動畫(0)
- 2009: 學校旅行(4)
- 2008: 香港紀律部隊(0)
- 2008: R.I.P 小花(0)
- 2007: 問你死未 - Tim Leung(0)
- 2007: What the World Eats(3)
- 2002: 德國隊呀!(0)
- 2002: 莫失莫忘(0)








17:02 on June 13th, 2005
An example of CC derivative work
http://www.tiney.com/maoshan/wakka.php?wakka=HowToRecordAPodcast