10
Jun
第一次在Blog-you 看到….不知怎形容好的文，還是頭一次看到人評擊觀塘和APM 得那麼激烈。唉！看完後請不要媽叉人，笑笑好了(也真的笑能死人 – 笑是能夠死人也)。我對於觀塘居民被無辜辱罵感到異常遺憾。原文連結。有關文章已被網主刪除，不過原文已被Google 存檔了。
抹走辱罵和人身攻擊，篇文亦罵出了香港市區環境多是亂七八糟，大商場總是播吵耳音樂來暗暗鼓吹消費等問題。
< 另一個地區個案 >
網絡暴民的城市規劃，Jacky 是將軍澳居民，深深體會社區發展過急の悲劇。
補充：綜合以上兩個個案，明大地理系阿啟的回應。
< 追加一個地區個案 >
Unemployed Philosopher： 望天的權利，南昌站興建中的巨型屏風影響深水(土步)區空氣質素 (Thanks to Sidekick)
當日今日：- 2011: 《回想・松本清張 私だけが知る巨人の素顔》(0)
- 2010: 芝士波(2)
- 2009: 《ぐるりのこと》(10)
- 2008: 清泉(6)
- 2008: 無嘴女王(5)
- 2008: 馬灣公園(4)
- 2007: ClickComment(14)
- 2006: RTFM(6)
- 2006: Tetris DS wifi 得分表(1)
- 2002: 唉！ 老了！(0)
02:11 on June 10th, 2005
看了那篇文，呢位小姐好明顯有「歧視地區」既症狀．．．我諗，如果我係觀塘居民，會兜巴星佢！
04:40 on June 10th, 2005
我之前也看到了
作為住在觀塘的人 很無奈也很失望
竟然有這樣的人
06:16 on June 10th, 2005
不要太過認真,個人意見而已。AMP 係幾嘈,同埋我發覺入面好多好多女學生…一D都唔似 High Car既商場.
09:19 on June 10th, 2005
個人意見就不需要認真？
10:32 on June 10th, 2005
小弟都係觀塘磨過一年，對依篇火爆文章真係感同身受！
特別係三十度高溫係開源道行過round，真係人都癲！
話分兩頭，講到最受人歧視既地區，有排都未輪到觀塘啦！深水x，天水圍，屯x，佢地係有數據咁比人歧視tim，住係果度少D EQ都死！
15:00 on June 10th, 2005
Riot : 我指的「認真」只是指不要為此而動怒, 以和為貴嘛.
16:11 on June 10th, 2005
pcheung25: 話分兩頭，講到最受人歧視既地區，有排都未輪到觀塘啦！深水x，天水圍，屯x，佢地係有數據咁比人歧視tim，住係果度少D EQ都死！
問題：可否解釋何謂「有數據咁比人歧視」？
16:28 on June 10th, 2005
hhaha, 例如果D 咩咩調查，話天水x最多男人打老婆，最多雙失青年or深水x最多持單程證人士聚居，一公布D人又wa wa 聲：依D區咁立亂架！
未就係拎住data 咁去歧視個別社區。
17:21 on June 10th, 2005
pcheung25: 那，請問Apple是不是「拎住data 咁去歧視」緊Intel?
http://www.apple.com/powermac/performance/
20:02 on June 10th, 2005
大家真的不要動怒，那位小姐亦是環境惡劣才嚴重失言。其實篇文出街之日我已經看了，只是想略等幾天，看看有沒有人回應，結果真是給我等到了，那些comment 都好搞笑。
講番那篇文，把觀塘與APM 的字換上中環與IFC，灣仔與Pacific Place，銅鑼灣與Time Square，都係一樣咁多人，試問香港市區那有靜靜的地方？
APM 是否高檔商場？我覺得它只是個年輕人潮流商場，咪又係另一個Times Square，同有無學生哥溜躂的關係不大。Pacific Place 在放學時間都好多學生架。
數據不歧視人，只反映實況，但會令看到的人有可能產生一些負面情緒，倒如看到Intel 比PPC 慢，有些人可能會說：「Intel 的CPU 咁鬼慢，拎去填海都費事啦！千祈不要用Intel CPU，唔係人都低俗埋。真係兜巴星佢！」
23:40 on June 10th, 2005
有些人看不過眼，貼到she.com 去。
http://community.she.com/messageboard/index.cfm?bdid=11&topic_id=1404731
呢位小姐仲被人「起底」，玉照曝光。
http://photos1.blogger.com/img/230/1230/640/274051019pzYdur_ph.jpg
相比起來，she.com 的用戶都不知幾激！甚麼型式的謾罵都有。
02:17 on June 11th, 2005
It’s on hkgolden now too. That “anti-miffy” guy must have a lot of free time on his hands to do all these stuff, geez~
http://forum.hkgolden.com/view.asp?message=446857&type=BW
In a way, this has a good point. Blog is private in a way, but it’s not. Even though we can post whatever we want on our blog, if other people don’t like what you say, you can get in trouble…
I have a feeling that this girl miffy is not like that in real life at all. Sometimes people take on a different personality on the internet for venting, so they can be as rude as they want. But in this case, she pissed off the wrong person and got made into such a big deal!
02:19 on June 11th, 2005
Nikita, you are moderating your comments now?
02:37 on June 11th, 2005
噢，無辦法，早排有成六十幾個spam，唯有收緊一下。
嘩！死得啦！去到高登呢d 層次咁高又聲稱至硬的討論區實比人批鬥死。
問題是，如果她沒有加入Blog-you 聯播，無咁多人接觸佢的大作，自然「出事」機會少，加上佢自己都要檢討下啦，佢本人係點可以在她自己的留言可以看得出，可能平時佢好善良兼奉公守法，但有人語氣平和地反問她，誰知佢的回應都好串下，如果佢唔係咁串又點會咁丫。
00:07 on June 12th, 2005
Sigh, as if the poor people in KT (or HKG for that matter) have a choice to not live in such a crowded place. Think about the poor old people who live in public housing in KT, worked in factories in KT, contributed their life to the prosperity of Hong Kong through KT. They are not there because they want to give you a hard time when you visit the neighborhood. They live there, and they do have too much of a choice where to live. Indeed, we owe them a lot.
00:40 on June 13th, 2005
還有這篇:
http://williamsin.blogspot.com/2005/06/blog-post_07.html
看到圖片, 覺得很難過…
09:23 on June 13th, 2005
Me too. (Well, a “me too” comment that Nikita should take some action)
KT, or Kowloon as a whole, is area in Hong Kong with the highest population density. Nearly all of the shopping malls in Hong Kong are marketed as the so called “high car” (High Class?) Any shopping mall out there marketed itself as “Low class”?
Adenosine Monophosphate, AMP, oh no… should be APM, I never visit there as I am a farmer living in Yuen Long and I just hate shopping. So I have no comment on this mall.