Comments on: 走出陰霾 http://www.naitik.net/blog/1754 Despite all my rage I am still just a rat in a cage Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:54:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: nikita http://www.naitik.net/blog/1754/comment-page-1#comment-16672 nikita Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:45:16 +0000 http://www.naitik.net/blog/1754#comment-16672 Walter：自你搬網誌後我便沒法找得到你，祝小B 早日康復！ Walter：自你搬網誌後我便沒法找得到你，祝小B 早日康復！

]]> By: gabe http://www.naitik.net/blog/1754/comment-page-1#comment-16669 gabe Tue, 05 Feb 2008 04:33:50 +0000 http://www.naitik.net/blog/1754#comment-16669 代答: 性能方面視乎你用邊個OS "One Step Tests: In XP, Parallels is 17% faster than VMWare Fusion on XP and 1% faster than Boot Camp. In Vista, VMware Fusion ran 46% slower than Boot Camp, and Parallels ran 44% slower than VMware Fusion. Multi Step (Cross platform) Tasks: Parallels was 6x faster than VMWare on XP, and 5.2x faster on Vista." http://www.macrumors.com/2007/12/19/boot-camp-vs-parallels-vs-vmware-benchmarks/ 代答:

性能方面視乎你用邊個OS

“One Step Tests: In XP, Parallels is 17% faster than VMWare Fusion on XP and 1% faster than Boot Camp. In Vista, VMware Fusion ran 46% slower than Boot Camp, and Parallels ran 44% slower than VMware Fusion.

Multi Step (Cross platform) Tasks: Parallels was 6x faster than VMWare on XP, and 5.2x faster on Vista.”

http://www.macrumors.com/2007/12/19/boot-camp-vs-parallels-vs-vmware-benchmarks/

]]> By: Walter http://www.naitik.net/blog/1754/comment-page-1#comment-16668 Walter Tue, 05 Feb 2008 02:52:59 +0000 http://www.naitik.net/blog/1754#comment-16668 其實, 在Mac OS X 上, Parallels Desktop 定係 VMWare Fusion 好用D? 其實, 在Mac OS X 上, Parallels Desktop 定係 VMWare Fusion 好用D?

]]> By: 地下A室 http://www.naitik.net/blog/1754/comment-page-1#comment-16652 地下A室 Fri, 01 Feb 2008 17:08:33 +0000 http://www.naitik.net/blog/1754#comment-16652 請問點樣可以歌碟詞repeat shuffle合一, 請賜教. 請問點樣可以歌碟詞repeat shuffle合一, 請賜教.

]]>